- The View panelists mentioned President Donald Trump’s reported proposal for ladies to recieve a $5000 “child bonus” after giving start through the April 23 episode
- Whoopi Goldberg voiced her robust opinions in opposition to the coverage, whereas Alyssa Farah Griffin supported it
- The co-hosts debated how useful the cash can be in comparison with the opposite insurance policies the administration has already lower, garnering a powerful response from the viewers
The View panelists are debating a brand new controversial political coverage.
Through the Wednesday, April 23, episode of the speak present, the co-hosts mentioned stories that President Donald Trump is proposing a $5000 “child bonus” for ladies after they provide start. Whoopi Goldberg slammed the thought, saying it confirmed simply how out of contact the present administration is.
“I’m extremely insulted by this,” Goldberg defined. “As a result of, clearly, they do not know how ladies’s our bodies work, and they do not know what it prices to lift a toddler or simply have a toddler.”
Garnering cheers from the gang, the actress went on to level out that ladies may also must pay taxes on the cash, doubtlessly leaving moms with simply $2500 — though Alyssa Farah Griffin famous “it depends upon your tax bracket.”
“Now, don’t neglect about all of the stuff they’ve lower!” Goldberg continued earlier than asking her co-hosts their opinions in a sarcastic tone.
“It’s like placing a band-aid on a deeper downside,” Sara Haines mentioned. “We don’t have paid household depart on this nation. We don’t have backed childcare. We’ve the best maternal mortality fee, and it’s 55% larger than the second place — that’s rather a lot for the wealthiest nation on this planet.”
After a calculation of first-year prices of getting a toddler, Haines revealed “a conservative estimate” can be round $16,000. “It’s simply not touching the floor,” she added. “I am a type of those that I really feel the earth is overpopulated. They need extra infants as a result of it impacts not solely the workforce, however paying into entitlement applications.”
When Pleasure Behar prompt the federal government tax billionaires extra to assist social companies as an alternative of encouraging ladies to have extra infants, Griffin got here to Trump’s protection, saying he “has really floated” that concept already.
“I really usually assist this coverage, which will shock you guys,” Griffin added of the infant bonus. “The primary concern I hear from younger folks is that they wish to have children, however they don’t know if they’ll afford it. And we may argue over whether or not or not it’s sufficient, the $5000, however each Italy and France do that. You get a one-time fee when you will have a toddler.”
She additionally cited “out-of-pocket prices for delivering a toddler” as lower than $5000, and mentioned that leftover cash may go right into a financial savings account for the kid to entry after they flip 18.
“We even have insurance policies like this in place,” Griffin continued. “We’ve the kid tax credit score, which provides you a tax credit score again for the variety of kids you will have, and the earned revenue tax credit score. Due to this concept that our social security internet — so social safety, medicare, medicaid — depend on the youthful inhabitants maintaining with the older inhabitants to allow them to pay into it.”
Her “caveat” is that the funds have to be given to everybody welcoming a child, not simply start moms, resembling homosexual {couples} and adoptive dad and mom.
By no means miss a narrative — join ipromiseyoumedia’s free every day group to remain up-to-date on the very best of what ipromiseyoumedia has to supply, from movie star information to driving human curiosity tales.
Nonetheless, Goldberg maintained her disdain for the proposal, calling out the administration for the numerous advantages for ladies that they’ve “slashed” since Trump took workplace. “$5,000 seems like some huge cash, however if you cannot pay your lease, in the event you can’t pay in your after faculty applications in your children…”
“Isn’t one thing higher than nothing?” Griffin chimed in. “No, not on this case,” Goldberg clapped again.
Griffin then declared: “I really feel like if Biden proposed this, we’d all be saying it’s groundbreaking.”
The viewers set free audible gasps as Goldberg stood her floor. “No. I’m sorry, I don’t like the concept that any individual is saying, ‘I’m gonna pay you to have extra children.’”
“Let me simply let you know this,” the EGOT winner mentioned because the phase got here to an finish. “$1 billion in funding for faculties and meals banks to purchase meals was lower. Withdrew funding for investigating baby sexual abuse and web crimes in opposition to kids — lower. Fired your entire employees working a program to assist low-income households pay their heating and cooling payments.”
“My level is, it appears to me that the whole lot this administration appears to be doing is telling folks to not have kids,” Goldberg concluded. “Why not ensure that children that we have already got have a shot at good education? Why not? If you need folks to have kids, you must not scare them by slicing all these applications that they could want.”
