NEED TO KNOW
- Dave Navarro claims that at a Jane’s Dependancy present in Boston in September 2024, Perry Farrell engaged in a “brutal and unprovoked” assault in opposition to Navarro
- Navarro accused Farrell of assault and battery in July 2025, and Farrell filed a solution in September 2025, denying “every allegation”
- On Wednesday, Dec. 17, Farrell issued an apology and the band introduced it is breaking apart
Jane’s Dependancy is splitting up. The announcement comes as Perry Farrell issued an apology after bandmate Dave Navarro accused him of assault and battery.
In July 2025, Navarro, 58, fellow bandmates Eric Avery and Stephen Perkins claimed in a $10 million lawsuit that Farrell, 66, launched a “brutal and unprovoked” assault throughout a mid-show incident in Boston in September 2024. Farrell filed a solution in September 2025, denying “every allegation” and in search of for the criticism to be dropped.
On Wednesday, Dec. 17, the musician issued an apology “to everybody in Boston, and world wide,” writing on Instagram that he wished to “tackle what occurred on stage final yr.”
“I’ve mirrored on it and know I did not deal with myself the way in which I ought to have. I apologize to our patrons and my bandmates for dropping my mood and for disrupting the present,” he wrote in an collaborative put up with the band. “Jane’s Dependancy has been on the middle of my life for many years.”
As he continued, he remarked on the “influence” that “the band, the songs, the patrons” made on “music and tradition,” saying it means extra to him “than any phrases [he] might ever presumably write down.”
“My purpose has all the time been to provide our viewers the very best present, one thing actual, trustworthy and optimistic. In Boston, we fell in need of that, and I am actually sorry to everybody who was impacted,” he wrote.
He concluded by thanking everybody for his or her “continued love and assist.”
The band then posted an Instagram announcement confirming they’re parting methods. The put up defined they “remorse” making “inaccurate statements about Perry’s psychological well being” and “unilaterally” canceling the tour after the Boston present in September 2024.
“In the present day we’re right here to announce that we now have come collectively one final time to resolve our variations, in order that the legacy of Jane’s Dependancy will stay the work the 4 of us created collectively,” the assertion learn.
“We now sit up for the long run as we embark on our separate musical and inventive endeavors. Jane’s Dependancy will without end stay in our hearts. We’re happy with the music we created collectively,” the assertion concluded. “You, the followers, are our lifeblood, and we are going to all the time respect you.”
Earlier than Farrell’s December apology, Navarro, Avery and Perkins’ July lawsuit alleged Farrell carried out intentional infliction of emotional misery, negligence, breach of fiduciary obligation, breach of contract and indemnity and contribution.
The allegations have been along with claims of Farrell’s “brutal and unprovoked” assault on stage and that he “continued his unhinged barrage of punches backstage (collectively, the ‘Assault’),” the submitting continued. “It rapidly pressured the termination of the present and ultimately all the Tour.”
The band canceled its reunion tour after the incident — after promoting over 100,000 tickets for the multi-city run.
On the time, a consultant for Farrell mentioned the submitting was “one other clear instance of the group uniting to isolate and bully” the frontman.
“It’s a clear try to manage the narrative and current themselves because the so-called ‘good guys’ — a transfer that’s each typical and predictable,” the assertion continued. “Identical to once they launched a defamatory and fully unfounded assertion about Perry’s psychological well being and unilaterally canceled the remaining tour dates with out his enter, they’re as soon as once more scrambling to get forward of the reality in a determined effort to avoid wasting face.”
Farrell’s September submitting said he “denies every allegation within the criticism,” in response to paperwork obtained by ipromiseyoumedia. He additional denies Navarro has “been broken in any approach or in any quantity by any means.”
He listed 35 affirmative defenses, claiming Navarro “fails to state information enough to represent a explanation for motion in opposition to” him, has “unclean arms” and “didn’t train affordable care and diligence to mitigate [the] alleged claims and damages.”
Farrell claimed he acted in “good religion and with out malice” towards Navarro, and was searching for the lawsuit to be dismissed and for Navarro to pay for his attorneys charges and authorized prices. He additionally requested that Navarro not be awarded something from the lawsuit.